Calero Blog

BYOD vs COPE: How Device Management Choices Impact Your Bottom Line

Written by Calero | Sep 25, 2024

In an era where mobile devices are deeply embedded in the workplace, the choice between Bring Your Own Device (BYOD) and Corporate-Owned, Personally Enabled (COPE) policies is a significant decision for any organization. The decision goes beyond operational convenience—it's a matter that can profoundly impact security, employee productivity, and ultimately, your bottom line. While BYOD might seem appealing for its flexibility and initial cost-saving potential, COPE offers greater control and security, making it a stronger choice for most businesses.

What is BYOD?

The Bring-Your-Own-Device(BYOD) mobile device management model allows employees to use their personal devices, such as smartphones and tablets, for work purposes. The model offers flexibility to the workforce and can offer initial cost savings, as companies do not need to supply devices to employees. This approach, however, presents several challenges, particularly in terms of security and compliance.

BYOD might appear to lower the upfront costs of hardware procurement, but that doesn't capture the hidden risks and potential for future costs that could devastate your organization. When employees bring their devices, organizations must invest heavily in mobile device management (MDM) tools, BYOD cyber security policies, and employee training to mitigate the risks.

BYOD Risks

BYOD introduces a number of cyber security challenges. Personal devices are often less secure than corporate-issued ones, exposing companies to vulnerabilities like malware infections, unauthorized access, and data leakage. While mobile device management software can help manage BYOD cyber security, it requires extensive oversight and constant updates to be effective. Furthermore, managing a diverse array of devices with varying operating systems and security patches can be difficult and resource-intensive.

On the flip side, BYOD can boost employee satisfaction and productivity. Employees are already familiar with their personal devices, reducing the learning curve associated with new hardware. However, that convenience often comes at the cost of security. In fact, data breaches stemming from personal devices are on the rise, which can lead to substantial financial losses, reputational damage, and compliance issues.

BYOD Advantages & Disadvantages

Advantages of BYOD:

  • Reduced initial hardware costs for the organization.
  • Greater flexibility and convenience for employees.
  • Higher employee satisfaction due to familiarity with personal devices.

Disadvantages of BYOD:

  • Elevated cybersecurity risks, including malware and data breaches.
  • Increased complexity in managing devices and enforcing security policies.
  • Potential for non-compliance with industry regulations.

 

What does COPE stand for?

COPE, or Corporate-Owned, Personally Enabled, refers to a mobile device management policy where the organization provides employees with devices, but allows them to use the device for personal tasks as well. This approach strikes a balance between security and user flexibility. COPE devices are centrally managed, which gives IT departments greater control over security protocols, software updates, and data access.

The Benefit of a COPE program

One of the key advantages of a COPE mobile device management strategy is control. Since the company owns the device, it can enforce stricter cyber security policies without infringing on personal privacy. IT departments can control which applications are installed, ensure timely software updates, and monitor for security threats in real time. This drastically reduces the risk of data breaches and ensures better compliance with industry standards like GDPR, HIPAA, and PCI-DSS.

Additionally, COPE simplifies the deployment of mobile device management tools. Because all devices are standardized, companies can streamline security protocols, reducing the risk of vulnerabilities arising from inconsistent or outdated software. The ability to maintain control over device settings, encryption standards, and application access gives organizations peace of mind that is often unattainable with BYOD.

From a financial perspective, while COPE may involve higher upfront costs for purchasing devices, these expenses are offset by the increased security and reduced complexity in managing the mobile environment. Security incidents, particularly data breaches, can be extremely costly. Studies show that the average cost of a data breach can exceed $4.45 million globally in 2023, making the investment in COPE devices a prudent decision when weighing potential financial risks.

COPE Advantages & Disadvantages

Advantages of COPE:

  • Greater security control and easier compliance with regulatory standards.
  • Streamlined mobile device management and simplified MDM deployments.
  • Lower risk of data breaches, malware infections, and insider threats.

Disadvantages of COPE:

  • Higher upfront costs due to purchasing devices.
  • Employees may feel less autonomy over the devices they use.
  • Requires management of both personal and professional usage, which could blur the lines of work-life balance.

 

BYOD vs COPE: Which Is Better for Your Bottom Line?

While BYOD may initially appear to be the more cost-effective option due to reduced hardware expenses, the hidden costs of securing personal devices and mitigating the associated risks can quickly negate those savings. In contrast, COPE may require more initial investment, but it provides long-term cost savings by reducing security risks and simplifying IT management.

For organizations handling sensitive data—such as those in healthcare, finance, or legal sectors—the COPE security benefits far outweigh the initial costs. With stricter control over the devices used, companies can avoid the costly repercussions of data breaches, insider threats, and compliance violations. COPE ensures the organization can maintain visibility and control over every device accessing the corporate network, thus minimizing the likelihood of security incidents.

In summary, COPE offers greater long-term value by providing a higher level of security, easier device management, and reduced risks of breaches and compliance violations. While BYOD policies offer convenience and flexibility, they often come at the significant cost of higher security risks and complex management demands.

Choosing the Right Path for Your Organization

When evaluating BYOD vs COPE, the choice comes down to the balance between cost, control, and risk tolerance. BYOD can be an attractive option for organizations with fewer security concerns or those seeking to reduce hardware costs. However, COPE delivers greater control, enhanced security, and peace of mind, making it a better option for companies that prioritize security and compliance.

With the ever-evolving threats in today's business landscape, the financial impact of a security breach can be devastating. For most organizations, especially those operating in regulated industries, COPE provides the strategic advantage needed to protect your organization's reputation and ultimately bottom line.

By adopting a COPE policy, you are not only investing in security and compliance but also in the longevity and financial health of your organization. In an increasingly complex cyber environment, control is everything, and COPE is your best path forward.